The difference between consensus and faith knowledge is a very debatable and discussion-oriented question.
So, there can be a lot of beliefs and understandings of these terms and concepts. Let’s talk and explore these two and get clarity on how they’re different from one another.
Faith, on the one hand, can be considered a religious belief, but sometimes it is just a sense or form of belief so strong that it can make you strive for something not in easy reach.
On the one hand, even consensus can be just an opinion, or it can also be a judgment or agreement that has been concluded.
1. Faith Knowledge and its Interpretations
So, when we talk about faith knowledge, how do we actually define it? Even if we break down the terms faith and knowledge, they can actually be contradictory. Faith is a belief-like concept, and knowledge is something more concrete, maybe backed by evidence.
In another sense, faith knowledge can also be seen as the acquired information from a faith that exists or what information or data you can retrieve or retain based on your beliefs.
For example, if we turn to Indian mythology, then it is a well-known fact that the Ramayana is a story; it is not a real-life happening that has been written.
It is a story that has been formulated to dictate what idealistic behavior is, to basically set standards for us so that we know what is right and wrong. Even above that, what is the most righteous behavior, and how does that need to be achieved in different situations?
So, we now know that god Rama followed a certain path or method in life, and we all know that to date, so much that it is actually ingrained in our brains. But this knowledge that resides in our brain has just coped out of our belief in the Ramayana.
It is not like a scientifically proven and written rule book but a mythological story. It is a story in which Hindus, or maybe other people, also believe, and they have faith in the plot and believe that if they follow the same, they will attain the best nirvana.
2. Consensus Knowledge and its Interpretations
Consensus knowledge also has varied meanings and understandings of the concept. So, before we actually understand the meaning of consensus knowledge, let us understand two terms: consensus and disagreement.
These are two terms that are actually concepts that can define the process of knowledge building or conclusion formation.
The difference in these words is that the outcome from a disagreement form of situation can actually be robust, meaning robust knowledge.
The term robust knowledge implies the information that has been accepted widely or is globally accepted. This is some data that has been derived from the two very conflicting opinions and perspectives.
Coming next to consensus is a more easy and open process of knowledge development. Unlike robust knowledge in consensus knowledge, there is no capping of opinion because there are not just two conflicting sides; there can be more, and you do not have to choose just one.
Secondly, there can be more, and all can be agreed upon; some parts of different sides can also be taken together and clubbed into one data set. This process leads to an extension of knowledge, and you get to know and understand more from different perspectives.
Due to the hindrance that is created by choosing one stance, you are deprived of the learning process, which, in such cases, involves not just data but a lot of other factors like human emotions.
When you step into a long process, there is a lot of logical reasoning and development of human thinking. Due to a reasoning pattern present at each step, we also understand the thought processing of the two sides as each one puts up arguments in their favor.
3. The Difference Between the Two: How is Faith Knowledge Different from Consensus Knowledge?
Based on what we have understood above, we can safely conclude that consensus knowledge and faith knowledge are two very different and unrelated concepts to some extent.
A comparison has been drawn to elaborate more on the ideology behind these concepts, meaning that they stand in completely different places according to some definitions; one should not mix up both and understand these two clearly.
So, the learning process is entirely different. How conclusions are arrived at and what the acceptability and acknowledgment of the two are really different.
Faith can be linked more to religion, which is very distinguishing because, for consensus knowledge, there is no backing possible.
Each holds its own significance in history and even in the present time. Both can be linked to each other in some ways, but they’re dissimilar in most ways. Which is the more preferred one is hard to say because it depends upon which ideology is preferred by whom.
4. Faith Knowledge Vs. Consensus Knowledge
In conclusion of the discussion between the two, we can say that several factors influence them. An aspect of religious guidance comes into play along with mythology. And with evidence-backed data, there is also a scientific angle.
Considering many other variables, it is a very open-ended comparison, and we can not really draw a line to define either of these. What we can say is each holds its own value and definition, and the acceptability is variable based on the ideologies that a person follows.